I don't know what Prospero Nograles has been eating lately, but it seems his food has not been doing anything good for his memory. Presumably in defense of HR1109, he raises his concern that "[w]hen the Senate approved Joint Congressional Resolution 10, which proposes to change the present system of government to federal system, even the so-called civil society, our Church leaders and the traditionally noisy political personalities were nowhere in sight." He adds to his litany that "[t]hese personalities were eerily quiet and unconcerned when, in fact, the Joint Congressional Resolution has the same purpose, which is to amend the Constitution" which was "overwhelmingly signed by 15 senators". Perhaps unable to put a leash on his unwarranted eloquence, he then asks: "[i]s it because the House is an administration ally?"
Well, what else can be said? Your boss is widely untrusted these days you need not wonder why that distrust trickles down to every single vein in the House. Your grand mommy is immensely unpopular and simultaneously infamous these days you need not be dumbfounded why that public eye of discontent and that public sense of suspicion is berating you and your con-asses. That reveals a lot about the fate of political aspirants these coming elections, assuming we'll be having one, whose names are caught in a tangle with Gloria.
Gloria be thy name and thy kingdom will come plummeting like a shooting star fading in the distant velvet sky thereafter; like a ballot completely missing the box by a wide mile.
To be sure, though, it was Jose De Venecia Jr. who cast the first stone, contrary to the delusion of a prosperous representative who firmly believes that it was the Senate that first struck the proverbial iron while it was still hot. In fact, that happened at a time when Jose De Venecia Jr. was still wearing the political banner of the current administration—like a sheath of linen veiling the full glory of his body, or God knows what—as a symbol of his fidelity to the unholy alliance. Proof to his perception of what the country should be like at the time, De Venecia even envisioned "a French-style parliament in which a president is directly and nationally elected by the people". Towards the end of his flight of fantasy, it dawned upon him that his effort was an exercise in futility, thereafter punctuating the sober end of his dementia praecox with a gnash of the teeth from all opposing sides.
I do not know, too, who told Prospero Nograles that flimsy idea he is currently holding, but whoever that person is, she or he deserves a sanction in whatever form the liking of the Congressman from Davao will be. In any case, the Senate did not start Con-Ass, although some more than others are asses in their own mind-boggling ways. Some are womanizers more than others, pretentious with their zeal of fighting for the ultimate cause of women's justice, but that would be for another day of writing. Going back, Jose De Venecia did. The fellow who is now standing at the peak of madness, flanked from both sides by no less than the sheer weight of the political controversies that litter his face and name, staring down at the apostles of his former master or mistress from the height of insanity, and relentlessly pleading for mercy before the altar of public judgment, did. The guy from Pangasinan, whose ears give rise to the penultimum definition of genetic mutation for having grown a face and a body out of those massive ears, vast forehead notwithstanding, did.
I certainly do not know what Nograles has been devouring for food these days, but paying a visit to a physician might lend him a useful explanation. He is quick to forget things. He easily fails to recall that part of history which he himself bore witness to in full flesh.
The Congressman from Nueva Ecija, Rodolfo Antonino who is also a key proponent of HR 1109, believes that "there is a common agreement among everybody that there is really a need for charter change". He further states that "[w]e've gone through three presidents. The response has always been, 'It is not the right time.' When will be the right time?"
Well, for one thing, he is unmistakably wrong in believing that there is a common agreement among everybody that there is really a need for Cha-Cha, unless of course what he means by "everybody" is "everybody in the majority". Had he, too, grown so blind to be unable to see the protest of the people against any motive to alter the Constitution at this time? Had he, too, grown so deaf to be unable to hear the thundering collective voice of those who shout in defiance to any measure of toying around the Constitution like an onanist's dick? For someone who is presumed to be sensitive enough to see and hear the hostile responses of one's constituents so that, in the light of just principles, one may learn a lesson or two and pluck out a sensible act from all the madness and mayhem swirling around us, someone sure is an epic failure as a representative of the people.
And quite another. True, we've gone through three presidents. It is similarly true that the response has always been "it is not the right time". But asking when the right time will be while shamelessly advancing a perverted house resolution that has grown all signs of life overnight through the fury of ayes is patent proof of begging for it, "it" being the public approval. It is as if the fellow from Nueva Ecija is saying that "now is the right time" because the issue of charter change has already lingered for roughly eighteen years at the least. It's as if he is saying that now is the right time to do surgery with the Constitution because it's been quite a while since we've done a major operation with the fountainhead of the laws of the land.
Now is the right time? Now is the wrong time. You only have to call upon the name of the swine oiling herself with the people's fat to gather all the wrong reasons in the world. The pig's record speaks for itself. It's not Cha-Cha that we need. Supremely important is accountability, the one thing this administration has monumentally failed to commit itself with.
When you have all these people sitting atop the political hierarchy and playing around like foolhardy fools, they're quite enough to cause a pandemic problem on this side of the planet faster than A(H1N1).
Well, what else can be said? Your boss is widely untrusted these days you need not wonder why that distrust trickles down to every single vein in the House. Your grand mommy is immensely unpopular and simultaneously infamous these days you need not be dumbfounded why that public eye of discontent and that public sense of suspicion is berating you and your con-asses. That reveals a lot about the fate of political aspirants these coming elections, assuming we'll be having one, whose names are caught in a tangle with Gloria.
Gloria be thy name and thy kingdom will come plummeting like a shooting star fading in the distant velvet sky thereafter; like a ballot completely missing the box by a wide mile.
To be sure, though, it was Jose De Venecia Jr. who cast the first stone, contrary to the delusion of a prosperous representative who firmly believes that it was the Senate that first struck the proverbial iron while it was still hot. In fact, that happened at a time when Jose De Venecia Jr. was still wearing the political banner of the current administration—like a sheath of linen veiling the full glory of his body, or God knows what—as a symbol of his fidelity to the unholy alliance. Proof to his perception of what the country should be like at the time, De Venecia even envisioned "a French-style parliament in which a president is directly and nationally elected by the people". Towards the end of his flight of fantasy, it dawned upon him that his effort was an exercise in futility, thereafter punctuating the sober end of his dementia praecox with a gnash of the teeth from all opposing sides.
I do not know, too, who told Prospero Nograles that flimsy idea he is currently holding, but whoever that person is, she or he deserves a sanction in whatever form the liking of the Congressman from Davao will be. In any case, the Senate did not start Con-Ass, although some more than others are asses in their own mind-boggling ways. Some are womanizers more than others, pretentious with their zeal of fighting for the ultimate cause of women's justice, but that would be for another day of writing. Going back, Jose De Venecia did. The fellow who is now standing at the peak of madness, flanked from both sides by no less than the sheer weight of the political controversies that litter his face and name, staring down at the apostles of his former master or mistress from the height of insanity, and relentlessly pleading for mercy before the altar of public judgment, did. The guy from Pangasinan, whose ears give rise to the penultimum definition of genetic mutation for having grown a face and a body out of those massive ears, vast forehead notwithstanding, did.
I certainly do not know what Nograles has been devouring for food these days, but paying a visit to a physician might lend him a useful explanation. He is quick to forget things. He easily fails to recall that part of history which he himself bore witness to in full flesh.
The Congressman from Nueva Ecija, Rodolfo Antonino who is also a key proponent of HR 1109, believes that "there is a common agreement among everybody that there is really a need for charter change". He further states that "[w]e've gone through three presidents. The response has always been, 'It is not the right time.' When will be the right time?"
Well, for one thing, he is unmistakably wrong in believing that there is a common agreement among everybody that there is really a need for Cha-Cha, unless of course what he means by "everybody" is "everybody in the majority". Had he, too, grown so blind to be unable to see the protest of the people against any motive to alter the Constitution at this time? Had he, too, grown so deaf to be unable to hear the thundering collective voice of those who shout in defiance to any measure of toying around the Constitution like an onanist's dick? For someone who is presumed to be sensitive enough to see and hear the hostile responses of one's constituents so that, in the light of just principles, one may learn a lesson or two and pluck out a sensible act from all the madness and mayhem swirling around us, someone sure is an epic failure as a representative of the people.
And quite another. True, we've gone through three presidents. It is similarly true that the response has always been "it is not the right time". But asking when the right time will be while shamelessly advancing a perverted house resolution that has grown all signs of life overnight through the fury of ayes is patent proof of begging for it, "it" being the public approval. It is as if the fellow from Nueva Ecija is saying that "now is the right time" because the issue of charter change has already lingered for roughly eighteen years at the least. It's as if he is saying that now is the right time to do surgery with the Constitution because it's been quite a while since we've done a major operation with the fountainhead of the laws of the land.
Now is the right time? Now is the wrong time. You only have to call upon the name of the swine oiling herself with the people's fat to gather all the wrong reasons in the world. The pig's record speaks for itself. It's not Cha-Cha that we need. Supremely important is accountability, the one thing this administration has monumentally failed to commit itself with.
When you have all these people sitting atop the political hierarchy and playing around like foolhardy fools, they're quite enough to cause a pandemic problem on this side of the planet faster than A(H1N1).
|